The
future of South Korea’s youth looks bright.
Surrounded
by a top technology industry, rising educational levels and improving health
care access, young people are in a good place.
However,
there is one trend that looks like it could hinder the country’s growth in an
alarming — and literal — way.
A
2013 Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare report found that about 5.5 percent of
all babies in South Korea are born underweight.
What’s
that look like?
Below
5.5 pounds, babies are underweight, and below 3.3 pounds, it’s severe.
According
to the Ministry and University of Illinois neonatal professor Chang Gi Park,
that is double the figure of 20 years ago.
And
Korea’s not the only country producing underweight infants. As of 2010,
Australia was also at 6 percent; Argentina, 7 percent; Japan, 9.6 percent.
All
these tiny babies should be setting off international alarms, right?
Low
birth weight can cause long-term risks, including congenital issues or higher
infection risks.
It’s
a little more complicated than that, though.
First
off, a baby’s health primarily depends on its environment. “In some ways, low
birth weight is not a bad thing,” says Dr. Carol Miller, a neonatologist at the
University of California, San Francisco.
If
a baby lives in a safe home with a healthy mother and receives quality care,
the child will likely be fine.
The
CDC agrees, saying the first 28 days of a child’s life are among the most
critical for long-term health — which is more about the home where the stork
paid a visit than the size of the package it dropped off.
Take
the mother’s economic and cultural position: Positive mental health, enough
money coming in, and solid support from a gynecologic, prenatal and birthing
standpoint will help most any woman raise a healthy child.
Delete
all the aforementioned resources and it’s a whole other story.
A
mother in a developing nation who can’t breast-feed because of malnutrition?
A
teen who grew up poor, and also smokes, and has now been kicked out of the
house for getting pregnant?
The
underweight babies of those moms are far less likely to grow past their size
challenges.
But
if conditions are decent, clocking in under ideal weight doesn’t necessarily
spell doom for the smallest humans.
These
days, low birth weight can actually be an indicator of overall national
economic health.
Miller
says birth-weight rates have fallen globally in the past two decades — not
because of some plague afflicting infants, but rather because of better health
resources, including in the United States.
In
countries with stable economies, for instance, older women using reproductive
technology cause part of the birth weight drop.
Extra
hormones cause an increased number of multiple births and smaller babies
needing mom’s nutrients.
So
the next time you see an XS infant, hold the pity — its passport may be from a
better-off country than yours.
No comments:
Post a Comment