In scientific circles, the
hypothesis that reducing inflammation can lower the risk of heart disease has
been gaining ground. Last weekend, that hypothesis may have finally become
fact, with far-reaching implications.
At the European Society of
Cardiology meetings in Barcelona, the Novartis-sponsored CANTOS trial
demonstrated that an anti-inflammation drug (albeit one that is currently
reported to be priced at about $200,000 a year)
could reduce the risk of the combination of heart attacks, stroke and death
from cardiovascular disease in people who had previously had a heart attack and
a blood test that indicated the presence of inflammation. And it did so without
affecting cholesterol levels.
The effect on patient care
will not be immediate, but the study is transformative in moving inflammation
into the category of a modifiable risk factor for heart disease.
What is inflammation? The
body’s immune system protects us from foreign invaders, like viruses and
bacteria.
Inflammation is the body’s
response, with the activation of white blood cells and other substances. Most
often, that response helps us. In cancer, scientists have been using our own
immune systems to target disease.
However, sometimes, our
immune systems can actually attack our own body and cause disease; these are
called autoimmune diseases, like rheumatoid arthritis.
Now people are looking at
inflammation as contributing to the risk of common conditions, like heart
disease.
Paul Ridker, the principal
investigator of the CANTOS trial and a cardiologist at Harvard, is the leading
proponent of this inflammation hypothesis. [Disclosure: Paul is married to my
sister (and I want to disclose that) and so I have had a front row seat in
these developments over the last two decades.] His work and that of other
scientists carefully and methodically laid the groundwork for the idea that
giving people treatment that would quiet their immune systems would reduce
their risk of heart disease.
People who had a more
revved-up immune system had a higher risk of heart disease. And this risk was
in addition to what was indicated by traditional risk factors like smoking and
high cholesterol levels.
They found that statin
drugs, which are highly effective in reducing heart disease risk, actually not
only lowered cholesterol, but also calmed inflammation.
And so many speculated
that the benefit of statins may also derive from what they do to the immune
system.
But the question persisted
– could an intervention that targeted the immune system without affecting lipid
levels reduce heart disease risk? CANTOS used canakinumab, an expensive drug
that is approved for use in some autoimmune diseases, like juvenile arthritis.
It targets a particular part of the immune system and can reduce inflammation.
In the study of about
10,000 people who were randomized to receive canakinumab or placebo and
followed for 4 years, there was a benefit. For every 1000 people treated with
canakinumab, there were about 6 fewer deaths from heart attacks, stroke, or
heart disease.
There was also a higher
risk of an infection causing death.
There was no difference in
deaths from any cause (though the study was not designed to detect a difference
in overall deaths).
For patients, this trial
is not likely to make canakinumab a household name.
The benefits were modest, there were some
risks, and the price tag, at least now, is in the stratosphere.
But make no mistake, this
trial heralds the beginning of a new era in cardiology. It signals that the
manipulation of the immune system is likely to be another avenue of reducing
cardiovascular risk – and there are many possibilities with new drugs and old
ones that could be repurposed.
In fact, the NIH has
supported Dr. Ridker to investigate the possibility that methotrexate, an old
and inexpensive drug with anti-inflammatory effects, could reduce the risk of
heart disease – and that trial, theCardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial, according to
ClinicalTrials.gov is still recruiting.
And there is something
more. In an exploratory analysis that ultimately may or may not turn out to be
important, the CANTOS investigators reported that lung cancer rates and deaths
were much lower in the canakinumab.
Could such drugs reduce
the risk of cancer and heart disease? Could an even safer and less expensive
drug do the same thing? This trial should open the gates to an abundance of
future research.
The idea that inflammation
is important in heart disease is not new and is supported by a mountain of
science.
But now we may be at the
beginning of translating that science into strategies and interventions.
Healthy behaviors continue to be the best way to combat heart disease – but it
will be nice to have more tools available and to see this potential unfold in
the years ahead.
Source forbes
No comments:
Post a Comment